In Ricardo Gutierrez Aguilar (ed.), The Philosophy of Kant. New York: pp. 165-186 (2019)

Lucas Thorpe
Bogazici University
Kantian ethics today is dominated followers of Rawls, many of them his former students. Following Rawls they interpret Kant as a moral constructivist who defines the good in terms of the reasonable. Such readings give priority to the first formulation of the categorical imperative and argue that the other two formulations are (ontologically or definitionally) dependent upon it. In contrast the aim of my paper will be to show that Kant should be interpreted firstly as a moral idealist and secondly as, it least in a certain sense a particularist who takes morality to involve the exercise of recognitional capacities rather than following principles or rules. In claiming that Kant is a moral idealist we won’t mean to imply that he is an anti-realist, indeed we believe that he is a realist. Instead, by ‘moral idealism’ it is meant the position that maintains that to be moral is to instantiate an ideal. And so understood moral idealism can be seen as offering an alternative to both constructivism and utilitarianism.
Keywords Kant  Constructivism  Rawls
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Creating the Kingdom of Ends.Christine M. Korsgaard - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition.John Rawls - 2005 - Columbia University Press.
The Practice of Moral Judgment.Barbara Herman - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (8):414-436.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant on the Moral Ontology of Constructivism and Realism.Paul Formosa - 2013 - In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. pp. 185-196.
Is Kant a Moral Constructivist or a Moral Realist?Paul Formosa - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):170-196.
Rawls and Kantian Constructivism.Alexander Kaufman - 2012 - Kantian Review 17 (2):227-256.
On Kant's and Rawls's Constructivisms.Xiang-lu Zhao - 2008 - Modern Philosophy 4:36-42.
A Defense of Political Constructivism.Nicholas Tampio - 2012 - Contemporary Political Theory 11 (3):305-323.
Was Kant a 'Kantian Constructivist'?Jeremy Schwartz - 2017 - Kantian Review 22 (2):257-280.
Kant’s [Moral] Constructivism and Rational Justification.Kenneth R. Westphal - 2011 - In Pihlström & Williams Baiasu (ed.), Politics and Metaphysics in Kant. Wales University Press.
Rawls on Kantian Constructivism.Nathaniel Jezzi - 2016 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 4 (8).
Aristotelian Constructivism.Mark LeBar - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):182-213.


Added to PP index

Total views
80 ( #134,197 of 2,448,712 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #27,084 of 2,448,712 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes