Reconciling Justice and Pleasure in Epicurean Contractarianism

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2):423-436 (2013)
Authors
John Thrasher
Chapman University
Abstract
Epicurean contractarianism is an attempt to reconcile individualistic hedonism with a robust account of justice. The pursuit of pleasure and the requirements of justice, however, have seemed to be incompatible to many commentators, both ancient and modern. It is not clear how it is possible to reconcile hedonism with the demands of justice. Furthermore, it is not clear why, even if Epicurean contractarianism is possible, it would be necessary for Epicureans to endorse a social contract. I argue here that Epicurean contractarianism is both possible and necessary once we understand Epicurean practical rationality in a new way. We are left with an appealing version of teleological, individualistic contractarianism that is significantly different from Hobbesian contractarianism
Keywords Epicurus  Social contract  Lucretius  Mixed-motive games  Stag hunt
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-012-9348-5
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,013
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Morals by Agreement.David Gauthier - 1986 - Oxford University Press.
The Morality of Happiness.Julia Annas - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 1651 - Harmondsworth, Penguin.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-02

Total views
81 ( #84,417 of 2,312,513 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #480,900 of 2,312,513 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature