Faith and Philosophy 37 (4):516-535 (2020)

Authors
Jada Twedt Strabbing
Wayne State University
Joshua C. Thurow
University of Texas at San Antonio
Abstract
In Atonement, Eleonore Stump develops a novel and compelling Thomistic account of the atonement and argues that Anselmian interpretations must be rejected. In this review essay, after summarizing her account, we raise worries about some aspects of it. First, we respond to her primary objection to Anselmian interpretations by arguing that, contrary to Stump, love does not require unilateral and unconditional forgiveness. Second, we suggest that the heart of Anselmian interpretations—that reconciliation with God requires reparation/restitution/satisfaction—is plausible and well-supported by some of her own arguments. Third, we raise doubts about her views of the role of surrender in justification and the nature of justification itself. Finally, we question whether Stump’s account can successfully explain how the atonement deals with pre-justification sin. A central theme of our comments is that Stump’s Thomistic interpretation can be entwined with Anselmian interpretations to make a stronger account of the atonement.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.37977/faithphil.2020.37.4.8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,360
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Stump on the Nature of Atonement.E. J. Coffman - 2012 - In Kelly James Clark & Michael Rea (eds.), Science, Religion, and Metaphysics: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 144-151.
Stump's Forgiveness.Brandon Warmke - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (1):145-163.
Is the Atonement Necessary or Fitting?Anne Jeffrey - 2021 - Religious Studies 57:1-9.
Atonement and the Cry of Dereliction From the Cross.Stump Eleonore - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (1):1.
Atonement.Eleonore Stump - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
Anselmian Theism.Yujin Nagasawa - 2011 - Philosophy Compass 6 (8):564-571.
Stump On Forgiveness.Richard Swinburne - 2019 - Faith and Philosophy 36 (4):512-521.
The Ill-Made Knight and the Stain on the Soul.Michael Rea - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (1):117-134.
Christian Atonement and Kantian Justification.Philip L. Quinn - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (4):440-462.
Perfection, Near-Perfection, Maximality, and Anselmian Theism.Graham Oppy - 2011 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (2):119-138.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-07

Total views
8 ( #977,751 of 2,448,892 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #82,723 of 2,448,892 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes