Journal of the American Oriental Society 136 (4):705 (2021)
AbstractOf the three powers—Wei, Shu, and Wu—that divided China for the better part of the third century, Wei has received the most attention in the standard literary historical accounts. In a typical book of Chinese literary history in any language, little, if anything, is said about Wu and Shu. This article argues that the consideration of the literary production of Shu and Wu is crucial to a fuller picture of the cultural dynamics of the Three Kingdoms period. The three states competed with one another for the claim to political legitimacy and cultural supremacy, and Wu in particular was in a position to contend with Wei in its cultural undertakings, notably in the areas of history writing and ritual music. This article begins with an overview of Shu and Wu literary production, and moves on to a more detailed discussion of Wu’s cultural projects, both of which were intended to assert Wu’s legitimacy and cultural power vis-à-vis Wei and Shu’s claims to cultural and political orthodoxy. Ultimately, this article implicitly asks the question of how to write literary history when there is scant material from the period under question, and suggests that we perform textual excavations and make use of what we have to try and reconstruct, as best as we can, what once was. A good literary history of the Chinese medieval period, the age of manuscript culture and that of heavy textual losses and transfigurations, should be written with the awareness of the incomplete and imperfect nature of the data we do have, and incorporate the phenomenon of textual losses and transfigurations as well as some reflections on the underlying reasons into its narrative and critical inquiry.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Little Kingdoms and Big Theories of HistoryLittle Kingdoms in Kalinga: Ideologie, Legitimation Und Politik Regionaler Eliten.Rahul Peter Das & Georg Berkemer - 1997 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 117 (1):127.
Luther's Two Kingdoms Revisited: A Response to Reinhold Niebuhr's Criticism of Luther.Brent W. Sockness - 1992 - Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (1):93 - 110.
Quantitative Techniques and Humanistic-Historical Materialist Perspectives.Geraldine Pratt - 1989 - In Audrey Lynn Kobayashi & Suzanne Mackenzie (eds.), Remaking Human Geography. Unwin Hyman. pp. 101--15.
Remaking the World, or Remaking Ourselves? Buddhist Reflections on Technology.David R. Loy - 2003 - In Peter D. Hershock, M. T. Stepani͡ant͡s & Roger T. Ames (eds.), Technology and Cultural Values: On the Edge of the Third Millennium. East-West Philosophers Conference. pp. 176--87.
Ibn Al-Sid Al-Batalyawsi (444/1052-521/1127): From the Taifa Kingdoms to the Almoravid Period Through the Biography of a Versatile Ulema. [REVIEW]D. Serrano - 2002 - Al-Qantara 23 (1):53-92.
The Doctrine of the Two Kingdoms: Miracles, Monotheism, and Reason in Spinoza.Michael LeBuffe - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (2):318-332.
Michael Zuckerman, "Peaceable Kingdoms". [REVIEW]John M. Murrin - 1972 - History and Theory 11 (2):226.
Leviathan and the Wars of the Three Kingdoms.Sarah Mortimer & David Scott - 2015 - Journal of the History of Ideas 76 (2):259-270.
Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy. [REVIEW]Jane Maienschein - 2007 - Isis 98:816-817.
Studies on the Role of the Clergy in the Elections of Kings in the Frankish and German Kingdoms. [REVIEW]Franz Staab - 1977 - Philosophy and History 10 (1):115-118.
Remaking the Middle Ages: The Methods of Cinema and History in Portraying the Medieval World. [REVIEW]Susan Aronstein - 2012 - Speculum 87 (3):867-868.
Modernizing the Mind: Psychological Knowledge and the Remaking of Society. [REVIEW]Nadine Weidman - 2005 - Isis 96:676-677.