La noción plural de sujeto de justicia. Un nuevo reto para la filosofía

Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía:171-179 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Thinking the future of Justice implies not only answering the question, considered its object: what is it due?, but another more original: To whom is it due? Theories of Social contract, specially the rawlsian, have a great influence on contemporary models of justice. Some of the most powerful critics are the ones held by Walzer, who integrates the plurality in the very structure of the justice, and by Nussbaum, who emphasizes the importance of grasping the subject of justice as plural. A new step is needed: recognizing the plurality in the social links, if we wish a reliable theory of justice

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Algunas concepciones de la justicia.Agustín Squella - 2010 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 44:175-216.
Justicia social en clave de capacidades y reconocimiento.Ana Fascioli - 2011 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 23 (1):53-77.
Uma teoria da justiça para um mundo globalizado.Luiz Paulo Rouanet - 2002 - Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 7 (18):57-68.
El segundo Rawls, más cerca de Hegel.Victoria Camps - 1997 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 15:63-70.
A Rawlsian Perspective on Justice for the Disabled.Adam Cureton - 2008 - Essays in Philosophy 9 (1):55-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
26 (#574,431)

6 months
5 (#526,961)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lidia De Tienda Palop
Hokkaido University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations