The fixation of knowledge and the question-answer process of inquiry

Grazer Philosophische Studien 77 (1):23-44 (2008)

Authors
Claudine Tiercelin
Institut Jean Nicod
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to present some important insights of C. Hookway's pragmatist analysis of knowledge viewed less in the standard way, as justified true belief, than as a dynamic natural and normative question-answer process of inquiry, a reliable and successful agent-based enterprise, consisting in virtuous dispositions explaining how we can be held responsible for our beliefs and investigations. Despite the merits of such an approach, the paper shows that it may be inefficient in accounting for some challenges posed by scepticism or by the nature of epistemic normativity. In which case it might be premature to propose it as a new conception of knowledge against the standard one and worth considering a different, though still pragmatist, strategy, in which inquiry would aim at the fixation of knowledge, still viewed as justified true beliefs, i.e critical commonsensical, warrantedly assertible, intellectual and sentimental dispositions for which the epistemic agent, viewed less as an individual person than as a scientific community of inquirers, should be taken as a knowing and reliable agent, both answerable and responsible for her assertions
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1163/18756735-90000842
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,128
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Synopsis.[author unknown] - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:xiii-xxiii.
The Hiddenness Argument Revisited.J. L. Schellenberg - 2005 - Religious Studies 41 (3):287-303.
Knowledge by Indifference.Gillian Russell & John Doris - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):429 – 437.
Shifting Frames: From Divided to Distributed Psychologies of Scientific Agents.Peter J. Taylor - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:304-310.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
31 ( #307,474 of 2,311,514 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #350,755 of 2,311,514 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature