AI and Society 35 (4):885-893 (2020)

Niël Henk Conradie
University of St. Andrews (PhD)
Robotic and artificially intelligent systems are becoming prevalent in our day-to-day lives. As human interaction is increasingly replaced by human–computer and human–robot interaction, we occasionally speak and act as though we are blaming or praising various technological devices. While such responses may arise naturally, they are still unusual. Indeed, for some authors, it is the programmers or users—and not the system itself—that we properly hold responsible in these cases. Furthermore, some argue that since directing blame or praise at technology itself is unfitting, designing systems in ways that encourage such practices can only exacerbate the problem. On the other hand, there may be good moral reasons to continue engaging in our natural practices, even in cases involving AI systems or robots. In particular, daily interactions with technology may stand to impact the development of our moral practices in human-to-human interactions. In this paper, we put forward an empirically grounded argument in favor of some technologies being designed for social responsiveness. Although our usual practices will likely undergo adjustments in response to innovative technologies, some systems which we encounter can be designed to accommodate our natural moral responses. In short, fostering HCI and HRI that sustains and promotes our natural moral practices calls for a co-developmental process with some AI and robotic technologies.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s00146-020-00982-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Responsibility From the Margins.David Shoemaker - 2015 - Oxford University Press.
Conversation and Responsibility.Michael McKenna - 2011 - Oxford University Press USA.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

There Is No Techno-Responsibility Gap.Daniel W. Tigard - 2020 - Philosophy and Technology 34 (3):589-607.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Larry May, The Socially Responsive Self. [REVIEW]Kevin Gibson - 1997 - Philosophy in Review 17:188-190.
Larry May, The Socially Responsive Self Reviewed By.Kevin Gibson - 1997 - Philosophy in Review 17 (3):188-190.
Poetics of Performative Space.Xin Wei Sha - 2007 - AI and Society 21 (4):607-624.
Unpacking Digital Material Mediation.Heather Wiltse - 2014 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 18 (3):154-182.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #769,354 of 2,507,567 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #170,014 of 2,507,567 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes