Journal of Medical Ethics:medethics-2015-103071 (2016)

Authors
Baruch Brody
Rice University
Abstract
A traditional ethic of medicine asserts that physicians have special obligations to individual patients with whom they have a clinical relationship. Contemporary trends in US healthcare financing like bundled payments seem to threaten traditional conceptions of special obligations of individual physicians to individual patients because their population-based focus sets a tone that seems to emphasise responsibilities for groups of patients by groups of physicians in an organisation. Prior to undertaking a cogent debate about the fate and normative weight of special obligations and a traditional ethic for contemporary healthcare, we need a deeper examination of what the traditional ethic of special obligations really means. Here we offer a conception of ‘doubly distributed’ special obligations. Physicians and similarly minded healing professionals abiding by a traditional ethic have always spread their devotion and attention across multiple patients and have shared responsibilities with physician and non-physician colleagues in much the same way devoted parents have frequently distributed their special obligations across multiple children and across multiple parents. By taking up the extended analogy of parent we argue that doubly distributing special obligations need not contradict the possibility of special obligations in restructured collective forms of healthcare delivery and financing.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2015-103071
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,903
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Parental Obligation.Nellie Wieland - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (3):249-267.
Filial Obligations: A Comparative Study.Cecilia Wee - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (1):83-97.
A Theory of Filial Obligations.Brynn F. Welch - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):717-737.
Social Groups and Special Obligations.Kenneth Eric Shockley - 2002 - Dissertation, Washington University
Vulnerability, Dependence, and Special Obligations to Domesticated Animals: A Reply to Palmer.Eli Weber - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (4):683-694.
Anencephalic Infants and Special Relationships.Nancy S. Jecker - 1990 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (4).
Fiduciary Duties and Moral Blackmail.Simon Keller - 2017 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (2).
The Morality of Familial Obligation.Donald Bancroft Moulds - 2001 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-04-30

Total views
36 ( #283,290 of 2,409,593 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #150,309 of 2,409,593 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes