American Journal of Bioethics 14 (10):4-5 (2014)
| Abstract |
No abstract
|
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| ISBN(s) | |
| DOI | 10.1080/15265161.2014.947826 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Political Activism is Not Mandated by Medical Professionalism.Thomas S. Huddle - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):51-53.
Physicians' Dual Agency, Stewardship, and Marginally Beneficial Care.Kevin R. Riggs & Matthew DeCamp - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):49-51.
When Professional Obligations Collide: Context Matters.Kathryn M. Ross & Elizabeth Bernabeo - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):38-40.
Legal Barriers to Physicians' Stewardship Role.Jessica Mantel - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):40-42.
Getting Even More Specific About Physicians' Obligations: Justice, Responsibility, and Professionalism.Rebecca Bamford - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):46-47.
View all 8 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Addressing Dual Agency: Getting Specific About the Expectations of Professionalism.Jon C. Tilburt - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (9):29-36.
An Unbiased Response to the Open Peer Commentaries on “Does Consent Bias Research?”.Mark A. Rothstein & Abigail B. Shoben - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):W1 - W4.
Engaging With a Peer-Proposed, Additional Exploitation Condition: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Transnational Gestational Surrogacy: Does It Have to Be Exploitative?”.Jeffrey Kirby - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (5):W1 - W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World”.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):4-6.
On the Right to Know and The Use of Double Standards: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Right to Know Your Genetic Parents: From Open Identity Gamete Donation to Routine Paternity Testing”.An Ravelingien & Guido Pennings - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (5):W6 - W8.
Genetic Enhancement Revisited: Response to Open Peer Commentaries.Ruiping Fan - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (4):6-8.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Coming Era of Nanomedicine”.Fritz Allhoff - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):1-2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “An Open Letter to Institutional Review Boards Considering Northfield Laboratories' PolyHeme® Trial”: The Emergency Exception and Unproven/Unsatisfactory Treatment.Ken Kipnis, Nancy M. P. King & Robert M. Nelson - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):W49-W50.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Why Treat the Wounded?”.Michael L. Gross - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2):W1 – W3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Must Research Participants Understand Randomization?”.David Wendler - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):W1 – W2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Case for Evidence-Based Rulemaking”.Benjamin Sachs - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):1-3.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Trans Fat Bans and Human Freedom”.David Resnik - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):4-5.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Broader View of Justice”.Nancy S. Jecker - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):1-2.
Deidentification and Its Discontents: Response to the Open Peer Commentaries.Mark A. Rothstein - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):W1-W2.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Decisional Analysis of Consent”.Jonathan Baron - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):W51-W53.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2014-09-18
Total views
11 ( #796,689 of 2,410,101 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,624 of 2,410,101 )
2014-09-18
Total views
11 ( #796,689 of 2,410,101 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,624 of 2,410,101 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
