History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):265–80 (2012)

Authors
John J. Tilley
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Abstract
This paper challenges Francis Hutcheson's and John Clarke of Hull's alleged demonstrations that William Wollaston's moral theory is inconsistent. It also present a form of the inconsistency objection that fares better than theirs, namely, that of Thomas Bott (1688-1754). Ultimately, the paper shows that Wollaston's moral standard is not what some have thought it to be; that consequently, his philosophy withstands the best-known efforts to expose it as inconsistent; and further, that one of the least-known British moralists is more important than hitherto thought, in that he uncovers the inconsistency Clarke and Hutcheson try in vain to elicit.
Keywords William Wollaston  Francis Hutcheson  John Clarke of Hull  Thomas Bott  British Moralists  Eighteenth Century Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Wollaston's Early Critics.John J. Tilley - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (6):1097-1116.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Wollaston, William.John J. Tilley - 2013 - In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Wollaston's Early Critics.John J. Tilley - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (6):1097-1116.
Hume and the Enthusiasm Puzzle.James Brian Coleman - 2012 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 10 (2):221-235.
The Problem of Circularity in Wollaston's Moral Philosophy.Olin Joynton - 1984 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (4):435-443.
Why Emotivists Love Inconsistency.Gunnar Björnsson - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 104 (1):81 - 108.
Consistent Inconsistency Theories.Bradley Armour‐Garb - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (6):639 – 654.
Wollaston’s Theory of Declarative Actions.Olin Joynton - 1981 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):439-449.
On Alleged Inconsistency in Reid's Theory of Moral Liberty.W. Dean Hazelton - 1978 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (4):453-455.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-07-24

Total views
448 ( #20,670 of 2,498,262 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #63,035 of 2,498,262 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes