John J. Tilley
Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis
Some of the most forceful objections to William Wollaston's moral theory come from his early critics, namely, Thomas Bott (1688-1754), Francis Hutcheson (1694-1746), and John Clarke of Hull (1687-1734). These objections are little known, while the inferior objections of Hume, Bentham, and later prominent critics are familiar. This fact is regrettable. For instance, it impedes a robust understanding of eighteenth-century British ethics; also, it fosters a questionable view as to why Wollaston's theory, although at first well received, soon faded in esteem among philosophers. This paper gives Wollaston's early critics some of the attention they deserve. It reconstructs some of their objections to Wollaston's philosophy, addresses replies to those objections, and shows that despite some minor flaws, the objections succeed. A fact that becomes clear is that Wollaston's philosophy had suffered devastating criticism years before Hume wrote anything against it.
Keywords Wollaston, William  Clarke, John  Hutcheson, Francis  Bott, Thomas
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2012.731239
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Hutcheson on Practical Reason.Stephen Darwall - 1997 - Hume Studies 23 (1):73-89.
Wollaston and His Critics.Joel Feinberg - 1977 - Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (2):345.
William Wollaston on Property Rights.George Smith - 1978 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 2 (3):217-224.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Problem of Inconsistency in Wollaston's Moral Theory.John J. Tilley - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):265–80.
British Moralists.L. A. Selby-Bigge - 1897 - New York: Dover Publications.
Hume's Refutation of -- Wollaston?Oliver A. Johnson - 1986 - Hume Studies 12 (2):192-200.
Reviews. [REVIEW]Arthur Wollaston - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9 (36):339-340.
Wollaston’s Theory of Declarative Actions.Olin Joynton - 1981 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):439-449.
Hume’s Concealed Attack on Religion and His Early Critics.James Fieser - 1995 - Journal of Philosophical Research 20:431-449.
Wollaston and Swift: A Source for the Houyhnhnms?David Joseph Leigh - 1980 - Philosophy and Literature 4 (1):92-106.
The Problem of Circularity in Wollaston's Moral Philosophy.Olin Joynton - 1984 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (4):435-443.
Response to My Critics.P. J. E. Kail - 2010 - Hume Studies 36 (1):97-107.
Reply to Radcliffe and Garrett.Rachel Cohon - 2008 - Hume Studies 34 (2):277-288.


Added to PP index

Total views
369 ( #17,610 of 2,325,532 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #35,117 of 2,325,532 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes