Annihilation Isn't Bad For You

Abstract

In The Human Predicament, David Benatar develops and defends the annihilation view, according to which “death is bad in large part because it annihilates the being who dies.” In this paper, I make both a positive and negative argument against the annihilation view. My positive argument consists in showing that the annihilation view generates implausible consequences in cases where one can incur some other (intrinsic) bad to avoid the supposed (intrinsic) bad of annihilation. More precisely, Benatar’s view entails that would be prudent for someone to incur a non-trivial amount of pain in order to avoid being annihilated, even in cases in which the additional life one would live would not be good at all for the person living it. Yet, it seems imprudent to incur any amount of pain to continue living a life that isn’t good for the person living it, so annihilation itself cannot be (intrinsically) bad. Avoiding the implausible consequences I identify requires denying that annihilation is itself bad. My negative argument consists in demonstrating that standard forms of deprivationism can avoid all three of the major problems that Benatar attributes to them without having to posit that annihilation itself is bad.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Lucretius and the Fears of Death.Peter Aronoff - 1997 - Dissertation, Cornell University
Dissolving Death’s Time-of-Harm Problem.Travis Timmerman - 2022 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):405-418.
Benatar on the Badness of All Human Lives.Iddo Landau - 2020 - Philosophia 49 (1):333-345.
In Defence of Euthanasia: The Epicurean View of Death.Andreas J. M. Blom - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Waterloo (Canada)
Sick and Healthy: Benatar on the Logic of Value.Skott Brill - 2012 - South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):38-54.
Well-being and death.Ben Bradley - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Anticipating annihilation.Mikel Burley - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (2):170 – 185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-06-30

Downloads
886 (#20,421)

6 months
215 (#15,494)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Travis Timmerman
Seton Hall University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Well-being and death.Ben Bradley - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The possibility of parity.Ruth Chang - 2002 - Ethics 112 (4):659-688.
Death.Thomas Nagel - 1970 - Noûs 4 (1):73-80.

View all 26 references / Add more references