Kantian Review 13 (1):171-177 (2008)

Authors
Jens Timmermann
University of St. Andrews
Abstract
Volume 12 (2007) contains a review of my little edition-cum-commentary of Kant's Grundlegung (Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, 2004; henceforth ‘CG’). As I am familiar with the work of the reviewer, Dieter Schönecker, most of the points mentioned did not surprise me. I was, however, taken aback by the, let us say, unhelpful manner in which they were raised. Schönecker's criticisms concern largely not ‘blunders’, ‘misinterpretations’ or ‘factual mistakes’ (155) but – besides the occasional misunderstanding on his part – matters of philosophical disagreement that might have been of interest to readers of the Kantian Review if set out in an informative, civilized and disinterested fashion. In what follows, I shall try to make these disagreements explicit.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1369415400001138
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,707
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Zur Analytizität der Grundlegung.Dieter Schönecker - 1996 - Kant-Studien 87 (3):348-354.
Kant über Menschenliebe als moralische Gemütsanlage.Dieter Schönecker - 2010 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92 (2):133-175.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-23

Total views
56 ( #166,183 of 2,333,198 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #256,625 of 2,333,198 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes