Journal of Indian Philosophy 45 (2):313-329 (2017)

Authors
Abstract
In this paper I explore the extent to which the dialectical approach of Śrīharṣa can be identified as skeptical, and whether or how his approach resembles that of the first century Mādhyamika philosopher Nāgārjuna. In so doing, I will be primarily reading the first argument found in Śrīharṣa’s masterpiece, the Khaṇḍanakhaṇḍa-khādya. This argument grounds the position that the system of justification that validates our cognition to be true is not outside of inquiry. Closely adopting Śrīharṣa’s polemical style, I am neither proposing a thesis in this paper that Śrīharṣa is a skeptic, nor am I denying such a possibility. I believe we can pursue our arguments on a neutral ground and let the facts speak for themselves. I will outline salient features that define skepticism in the mainstream philosophical discourse so that analyzing Śrīharṣa’s first argument becomes easier. In so doing, I will introduce some of the arguments of Nāgārjuna in light of Śrīharṣa’s position. This comparison, however, is restricted only to the salient features relevant to further the central argument of this paper and is therefore not aimed to encompass the overall positions of these two giants.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10781-016-9310-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,401
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intelligent Virtue.Julia Annas - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Hume's Reason.David Owen - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader.Keith DeRose & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) - 1999 - Oxford University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Khandanakhandakhadyam. Sriharsa, Anandapurna & Yogindrananda - 1979 - Saddar Sana Praka Sana Pratisthanam.
Justification-Skepticism.Todd Rudolph Long - 2003 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester
Skepticism and Justification.Risto Hilpinen - 1983 - Synthese 55 (2):165 - 173.
The Possibility of Inductive Moral Arguments.Mark T. Nelson - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (2):231-246.
Evidentialism and Skeptical Arguments.Dylan Dodd - 2012 - Synthese 189 (2):337-352.
Is Justification Knowledge?Brent J. C. Madison - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Research 35:173-191.
Is Justification Dialectical?Jan Willem Wieland - 2013 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 3 (3):182-201.
The Epicurean Argument: Determinism and Scepticism.Christopher Hookway - 1989 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):79 – 94.
Skepticism Reexamined.Marin Spasov Smillov - 1997 - Dissertation, University of Florida
An Argument for External World Skepticism From the Appearance/Reality Distinction.Moti Mizrahi - 2016 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 6 (4):368-383.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-12-27

Total views
12 ( #781,364 of 2,445,677 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,040 of 2,445,677 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes