Save (some of) the Children.

Philosophia 46 (2):465-472 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In “Save the Children!” Artúrs Logins responds to my argument that, in certain cases, it is morally permissible to not prevent something bad from happening, even when one can do so without sacrificing something of comparable moral importance. Logins’ responses are thought-provoking, though I will argue that his critiques miss their mark. I rebut each of the responses offered by Logins. However, much of my focus will be on one of his criticisms which rests on an unfortunately common misunderstanding of Singer’s argument in “Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” My response, then, is important not only because it salvages my positive argument, but also because it identifies, and corrects, this misunderstanding.

Similar books and articles

Save the children!Artūrs Logins - 2016 - Analysis 76 (4):418-422.
The Immorality of Having Children.Stuart Rachels - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (3):567-582.
Foreign aid and the moral value of freedom.Martin Peterson - 2004 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):293-307.
Children and the Argument from 'Marginal' Cases.Amy Mullin - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (3):291-305.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality.Peter Singer - 1972 - Oxford University Press USA.
Better Not to Have Children.Gerald K. Harrison & Julia Tanner - 2011 - Think, 10(27), 113-121 (27):113-121.
How Much for the Child?Christian Barry & Gerhard Øverland - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):189-204.
The Moral Objection to Modal Realism.Bob Fischer - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (5):1015-1030.
On Having Evidence: A Reply to Neta.Arturs Https://Orcidorg Logins - 2015 - Logos and Episteme 6 (3): 367-370.


Added to PP

356 (#57,391)

6 months
16 (#160,013)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?