Argumentation 16 (3):299-309 (2002)

Authors
Christopher Tindale
University of Windsor
Abstract
Ralph Johnson's Manifest Rationality (2000) is a major contribution to the field of informal logic, but the concept of argument that is central to its project suffers from a tension between the components that comprise it. This paper explores and addresses that tension by examining the implications of each of five aspects of the definition of ‘argument’
Keywords concept of argument  dialectical tier  informal logic  manifest rationality  Ralph Johnson  rhetoric
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1019997120075
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Defining ‘Argument’.Jeffrey Goodman - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (4):589-602.
What is a “Real” Argument?G. C. Goddu - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (1):1-14.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Dialectical Tier Within Reason.Amy J. Ohler - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (1).
Johnson on the Metaphysics of Argument.Leo Groarke - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):277-286.
The Practice of Argumentative Discussion.David Hitchcock - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (3):287-298.
When Informal Logic Met Critical Thinking.Ralph H. Johnson - 2012 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (3):5-14.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-21

Total views
31 ( #319,201 of 2,348,973 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #512,628 of 2,348,973 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes