Out of the Space of Reasons: Argumentation, agents, and persons
Pragmatics and Cognition 19 (3):383-398 (2011)
Abstract
The paper investigates the `logical space of reasons' as a social space in which rational agents operate and persons in an important sense come to be. Building from an investigation of argumentative agents in Aristotle's Rhetoric, I discuss both interior and exterior criteria for personhood and propose that the latter shows how argumentation, as a principal activity of the space of reasons, results in the particular kinds of persons we recognize there as rational agents. The overall analysis is indebted to Robert Brandom's centralizing of the practice of giving and receiving reasons and the suggestive ways this can be applied to the realm of argumentation.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1075/pc.19.3.01tin
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Giving Reasons Does Not Always Amount to Arguing.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):659-668.
Argumentative Virtues as Conduits for Reason’s Causal Efficacy: Why the Practice of Giving Reasons Requires that We Practice Hearing Reasons.Daniel Cohen - 2019 - Topoi 38 (4):711-718.
“Tätigsein und die Erste-Person-Perspektive” (Agency and the first-person perspective).Lynne Rudder Baker - 2008 - In Bruno Niederbacher & Edmund Runggaldier (eds.), Was Sind Menschliche Personen? Onto Verlag.
The Agentive Approach to Argumentation. Nino - 2015 - In Frans van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.), Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. pp. 53-67.
Stereoscopic vision: Persons, freedom, and two spaces of material inference.Mark Lance & H. Heath White - 2007 - Philosophers' Imprint 7:1-21.
Community, argumentation, and the legitimacy of reasons for action.Charles Blatz & Mano Daniel - unknown
Argumentation in ethics, legal dogmatics and legal practice.Aleksander Peczenik - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):747-756.
Rationality and persons.Carol Rovane - 2004 - In Piers Rawling & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 320--342.
Probabilistic rule-based argumentation for norm-governed learning agents.Régis Riveret, Antonino Rotolo & Giovanni Sartor - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (4):383-420.
Empathy, Shared Intentionality, and Motivation by Moral Reasons.Marion Hourdequin - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):403 - 419.
Argumentation, R. Pavilionis's meaning continuum and The Kitchen debate.Elena Lisanyuk - 2015 - Problemos 88:95.
Voluntarist reasons and the sources of normativity.Ruth Chang - 2009 - In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press. pp. 243-71.
The Idea of a Normative Reason.Hallvard Lillehammer - 2003 - In P. Schaber & R. Huntelmann (eds.), Grundlagen der Ethik. pp. 41--65.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-12-01
Downloads
45 (#262,060)
6 months
4 (#184,707)
2013-12-01
Downloads
45 (#262,060)
6 months
4 (#184,707)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Rhetorical Argumentation and the Nature of Audience: Toward an Understanding of Audience—Issues in Argumentation.Christopher W. Tindale - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):508-532.
Replicating Reasons: Arguments, Memes, and the Cognitive Environment.Christopher W. Tindale - 2017 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 50 (4):566-588.
Self-deliberation and the Strategy of the Pseudo-dialogue.Christopher W. Tindale - 2020 - Co-herencia 17 (32):159-178.
