Tragic Choices: Reaffirming Absolutes in the Torture Debate

International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2):209-222 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Events over the last decade have returned the issue of interrogational torture to one of immediate and urgent concern, as governments attempt to circumvent the constraints of the UN Convention against Torture. Philosophers still favor variants of the ‘ticking bomb’ scenario and view with suspicion, if not incomprehension, any absolutist prohibition of torture. In this paper, I reiterate and develop an absolutist position against interrogational torture, arguing that ‘ticking bomb’ scenarios are ill-considered and offer not what they purport to offer. I further make the case that assumptions behind the pro-torture position, particularly based on positive consequences of interrogational torture, are by no means as clear as apparently imagined, and that such practices challenge the very foundations of our moral lives in their attacks on notions of agency and responsibility. In any such extreme choice like the ones that torture presents, we must weigh what we might gain against what we might lose, and we always lose too much

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,442

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The "ticking bomb": a spurious argument for torture.Bob Brecher - 2012 - Torture: Asian and Global Perspectives 1 (1):30-38.
Why torture is wrong.Bob Brecher - 2012 - In Contemporary Debates on Terrorism. London: Routledge. pp. 159-165.
Tortured Knowledge: Epistemological Problems with Ticking-Bomb Cases.Eric M. Rovie - 2009 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):315-333.
For Interrogational Torture.Stephen Kershnar - 2005 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2):223-241.
Dirty hands and the romance of the ticking bomb terrorist: a Humean account.Christopher J. Finlay - 2011 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (4):421-442.
The Moral Justifiability of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment.Michael Davis - 2005 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2):161-178.
Ticking Bombs and Interrogations.Claudia Card - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (1):1-15.
Tortured Ethics.Matthew R. Silliman & David Kenneth Johnson - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 23:211-222.
Understanding Torture.Jeremy Wisnewski - 2010 - Edinburgh University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
72 (#169,574)

6 months
5 (#155,402)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Tindale
University of Windsor

Citations of this work

The Kantian Case Against Torture.Peter Brian Barry - 2015 - Philosophy 90 (4):593-621.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references