Pornographic Subordination: How Pornography Silences Women

In Claudia F. Card (ed.), Feminist Ethics and Politics. University Press of Kansas (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Making sense of MacKinnon’s claim that pornography silences women requires attention to the discursive and interpretive frameworks that pornography establishes and promotes. Treating pornography as a form of hate speech is promising, but also limited. A close examination of a legal case, in which pornographic images were used to sexually harass, focuses on the hate speech analogy while illustrating the broad and lasting impact of such depictions when targeted at an individual. Applying the distinction between Absolutist and Reclaimer approaches to hate speech and derogatory terms, the article concludes with a discussion of the possibility of creative development of discursive practices within a context that undermines the semantic authority of members of certain groups.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-14

Downloads
623 (#15,066)

6 months
28 (#43,842)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lynne Tirrell
University of Connecticut

Citations of this work

Feminist philosophy of language.Jennifer Saul - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references