Taking the trivial doctrine seriously: Functionalism, eliminativism, and materialism

Abstract
Gold & Stoljar's characterization of the trivial doctrine and of its relationships with the radical one misses some differences that may be crucial. The radical doctrine can be read as a derivative of the computational version of functionalism that provides the backbone of current cognitive science and is fundamentally uninterested in biology: both doctrines are fundamentally wrong. The synthesis between neurobiology and psychology requires instead that minds be viewed as ontologically primitive, that is, as material properties of functioning bodies. G&S's characterization of the trivial doctrine should therefore be correspondingly modified.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X9947219X
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,756
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Rethinking the Ontogeny of Mindreading.Maurizio Tirassa, Francesca M. Bosco & Livia Colle - 2006 - Consciousness and Cognition 15 (1):197-217.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Autonomous Psychology and the Moderate Neuron Doctrine.Tony Stone & Martin Davies - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):849-850.
How Trivial is the “Trivial Neuron Doctrine”?Steven G. Daniel - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-835.
The Nontrivial Doctrine of Cognitive Neuroscience.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-839.
Interpreting Neuroscience and Explaining the Mind.Ian Gold & Daniel Stoljar - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):856-866.
Neuron Doctrine: Trivial Versus Radical Versus Do Not Dichotomize.Barry Horwitz - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-840.
A More Substantive Neuron Doctrine.Joe Y. F. Lau - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):843-844.
Levels of Description and Conflated Doctrines.John A. Bullinaria - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):832-833.
The “Trivial Neuron Doctrine” is Not Trivial.Dale Jamieson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):841-842.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

41 ( #127,878 of 2,178,142 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #316,663 of 2,178,142 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums