Philosophy and Public Affairs 36 (3):289-322 (2008)

Michael Titelbaum
University of Wisconsin, Madison
A response to G.A. Cohen's argument that a prevailing "ethos" of justice would prevent a Rawlsian just society from having any income inequalities. I suggest that Cohen's argument fails because a Rawlsian ethos would involve correlates of both of Rawls' principles of justice.
Keywords Rawls, John  Cohen, G.A.  justice  egalitarianism  ethos
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00140.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,992
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Difference Principle at Work.Samuel Arnold - 2012 - Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (1):94-118.
Marx, Rawls, Cohen, and Feminism.Paula Casal - 2015 - Hypatia 30 (4):811-828.
The Inegalitarian Ethos: Incentives, Respect, and Self-Respect.Emily McTernan - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (1):93-111.
The Problem of Stability and the Ethos-Based Solution.Cristian Pérez Muñoz - 2016 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (2):163-183.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
148 ( #69,332 of 2,439,423 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,215 of 2,439,423 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes