Of Semiotics, the Marginalised and Laws During the Lockdown in India

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (3):977-1000 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On 24th March 2020, the first nationwide complete lockdown was announced by the Prime Minister of India for 21 days which was later extended to 31st May 2020. Consequently, thousands of migrant workers placed in big cities had no other option but to go back to their native villages. Their journeys back to villages- thousands of kilometres on bicycles or foot due to the non-availability of public transport amidst the travel ban- were driven by the compulsions of food and shelter. In one of many heart-wrenching incidents, sixteen laborers were run over by a freight train while they were resting on the railway tracks. The images of the Roti on the railway track strewn across were beamed on the national news channels, as a telling commentary of the unimaginable hardships of these workers. Ironically, in the eyes of law, they were trespassers under the Indian Railways Act, 1989. The Indian Railway did not pay any compensation to the victims. Their act also violated the Indian Disaster Management Act, 2005 and Indian Penal Code, 1860- the law for the breach of lockdown guidelines and the law for disobedience of order by public servants respectively- for having decided to travel amidst a travel ban. The semiotics of law-making acts ‘criminal’ bereft of ‘moral culpability’ are seldom questioned on their supposed amoral foundations. Pandemic exhibited that social fissures not only condition the individual or community actions but also the actions of the State. Minorities especially Muslims were at the receiving end of State’s selective enforcement of lockdown laws in India. The various instances in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic expose the hollow claims of equality before the law and the equal protection of laws as a constitutional promise to every citizen. This article aims to unravel the ostensible and the actual moral exhibition of such Indian laws through the lens of several incidents during the nationwide lockdown in India. This paper would argue that this constructed positivist amorality needs to be deconstructed to unearth the power imbalance that it seeks to hide.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lockdown Politics: A Response to Panagiotis Sotiris.Gareth Dale - 2021 - Historical Materialism 29 (1):247-262.
Justifying Lockdown.Christian Barry & Seth Lazar - 2020 - Ethics and International Affairs 2020.
Matter as effete mind.Lucia Santaella - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):49-61.
Imagining Law: Marginalised Bodies/Indigenous Spaces.Ben Hightower & Kirsten Anker - 2016 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 29 (1):1-8.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-01-06

Downloads
18 (#781,713)

6 months
12 (#174,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Morality of Law.Lon L. Fuller - 1964 - Ethics 76 (3):225-228.
Pandemica Panoptica: Biopolitical Management of Viral Spread in the Age of Covid-19.Anne Wagner, Aleksandra Matulewska & Sarah Marusek - 2021 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (3):1081-1117.
Central issues in jurisprudence: justice, laws, and rights.N. E. Simmonds - 1986 - London: Sweet & Maxwell. Edited by Joshua Neoh.

View all 9 references / Add more references