Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):275-293 (2012)
This paper is about two proposals endorsed by Xunzi. The first is that there is such a thing as a moral expert, whose moral advice we should adopt even when we cannot appreciate for ourselves the considerations in favor of it. The second is that certain political authorities should be treated as moral experts. I identify three fundamental questions about moral expertise that contemporary philosophy has yet to address in depth, explicate Xunzi’s answers to them, and then give an account of politically authorized moral expertise as Xunzi understands it. The three questions at the heart of this study are these: how should we distinguish between knowing the correct course of action on another’s authority and knowing it for oneself? What exactly are the underlying considerations that the expert grasps and the novice does not? Who are the experts and in what spheres of life can they legitimately claim expertise?
|Keywords||Xunzi moral expertise political authority|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Skepticism About Moral Expertise as a Puzzle for Moral Realism.Sarah McGrath - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy 108 (3):111-137.
What is Wrong with Moral Testimony?Robert Hopkins - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (3):611-634.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts.David Archard - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (3):119-127.
Between Good and Evil: Xunzi's Reinterpretation of the Hegemonic Rule as Decent Governance.Sungmoon Kim - 2013 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (1):73-92.
Expertise, Wisdom and Moral Philosophers: A Response to Gesang.Christopher Cowley - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (6):337-342.
Authenticating Expertise.Jason Borenstein - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):85-102.
An Ethics Expertise for Clinical Ethics Consultation.Lisa M. Rasmussen - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (4):649-661.
The Possibility of Ethical Expertise.Bruce D. Weinstein - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (1):1-187.
Transmuted Expertise: How Technical Non-Experts Can Assess Experts and Expertise. [REVIEW]Harry Collins & Martin Weinel - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):401-413.
Expertise as Argument: Authority, Democracy, and Problem-Solving. [REVIEW]Zoltan P. Majdik & William M. Keith - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):371-384.
The Epistemology and Ethics of Consensus: Uses and Misuses of 'Ethical' Expertise.Rosemarie Tong - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (4):409-426.
Added to index2012-07-13
Total downloads66 ( #79,391 of 2,168,179 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #38,721 of 2,168,179 )
How can I increase my downloads?