De animalibus: Michael Scot's Arabic-Latin Translation. Part Three, Books XV-XIX: Generation of Animals [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 49 (1):119-120 (1995)

Abstract

Historians of philosophy often overlook the fact that the reception of Aristotle's works in the Latin West during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries was largely the reception of a natural science. More than half the corpus is devoted to such topics as zoology, animal psychology, atmospheric studies, cosmology, chemistry, and physical mechanics. A full quarter of the corpus is devoted to zoology alone. This point was well understood among the first generation of Latin commentators. Scholars such as Robert Grosseteste and Albert the Great, while interested in Aristotle's metaphysics and ethics, realized that he was first and foremost a naturalist. Albert, in particular, understood that the work of the early peripatetics was primarily directed to plant and animal studies. Sharing their interests, Albert devoted much of his efforts to articulating, correcting, and extending their original scientific researches.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
7 (#1,075,552)

6 months
1 (#388,319)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael W. Tkacz
Gonzaga University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Michael Scot’s Arabic-Latin Translation, Part Two.Leo J. Elders - 2000 - Review of Metaphysics 54 (2):410-411.
De Animalibus.Michael W. Tkacz - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 60 (1):119-120.