International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (2):159-166 (2003)
Contemporary biologists generally agree with E. O. Wilson’s claim that “reduction is the traditional instrument of scientific analysis.” This is certainly true of Michael Ruse, who has attempted to provide a Darwinian account of human scientific knowledge in terms of epigenetic rules. Such an account depends on the characterization of natural objects as the chance concatenations of material elements, making natural form an effect rather than a cause of the object. This characterization, however, can be shown to be false in that it is self-refuting in its exclusion of formal cause. The retorsive argument for formal cause dialectically shows that any attempt to explain a natural object depends on the identification of form as the cause of the intelligibility of the object. It follows that Darwinian explanations of the products of human culture, such as science, cannot consistently treat form as an effect rather than a cause
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition Contemporary Philosophy History of Philosophy|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Really Taking Darwin Seriously: An Alternative to Michael Ruse's Darwinian Metaethics. [REVIEW]William A. Rottschaefer & David Martinsen - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (2):149-173.
Can a Darwinian Be a Christian? Sociobiological Issues.Michael Ruse - 2000 - Zygon 35 (2):299-316.
Scientific Realism, Scientific Practice, and the Natural Ontological Attitude.André Kukla - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):955-975.
The Narrative Reconstruction of Science.Joseph Rouse - 1990 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 33 (2):179 – 196.
Overqualified: Generative Replicators as Darwinian Reproducers.Matt Gers - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (4):595-605.
Ruse's Treatment of the Evidence for Evolution: A Reconsideration.Alexander Rosenberg - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:83 - 93.
Have Biologists Wrapped Up Philosophy?Stephen R. L. Clark - 2000 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (2):143 – 165.
Epistemological Contextualism and the Knowledge Account of Assertion.Joseph Shieber - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (1):169-181.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads15 ( #316,156 of 2,172,662 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,662 )
How can I increase my downloads?