Rule Consequentialism and the Problem of Partial Acceptance

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (3):643-652 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most plausible moral theories must address problems of partial acceptance or partial compliance. The aim of this paper is to examine some proposed ways of dealing with partial acceptance problems as well as to introduce a new Rule Utilitarian suggestion. Here I survey three forms of Rule Utilitarianism, each of which represents a distinct approach to solving partial acceptance issues. I examine Fixed Rate, Variable Rate, and Optimum Rate Rule Utilitarianism, and argue that a new approach, Maximizing Expectation Rate Rule Utilitarianism, better solves partial acceptance problems

Similar books and articles

Variable Versus Fixed-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism.Brad Hooker & Guy Fletcher - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):344–352.
A Refutation of Consequentialism.Robert Guay - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (3):348-362.
Epistemic Consequentialism.Philip Percival - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):121–151.
A Dilemma for Rule-Consequentialism.Jussi Suikkanen - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (1):141-150.
Introducing Variable-Rate Rule-Utilitarianism.Michael Ridge - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):242 - 253.
Rule-Consequentialism's Dilemma.Iain Law - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):263-276.
The Demands of Consequentialism.Tim Mulgan - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
The Problem of the Criterion in Rule-Following.Tomoji Shogenji - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):501-525.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-30

Downloads
294 (#39,067)

6 months
45 (#22,485)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?