Against Limited Foreknowledge

Philosophia 42 (2):523-538 (2014)
Patrick Todd
University of Edinburgh
Theological fatalists contend that if God knows everything, then no human action is free, and that since God does know everything, no human action is free. One reply to such arguments that has become popular recently— a way favored by William Hasker and Peter van Inwagen—agrees that if God knows everything, no human action is free. The distinctive response of these philosophers is simply to say that therefore God does not know everything. On this view, what the fatalist arguments in fact bring out is that it was logically impossible for God to have known the truths about what we would freely do in the future. And this is no defect in God’s knowledge, for infallible foreknowledge of such truths is a logical impossibility. It has commonly been assumed that this position constitutes an explanation of where the fatalist argument goes wrong. My first goal is to argue that any such assumption has in fact been a mistake; Hasker and van Inwagen have in effect said only that something does go wrong with the argument, but they have not explained what goes wrong with it. Once we see this result, we’ll see, I think, that they need such an account—and that no such account has in fact been provided. The second goal of this paper is therefore to develop— and to criticize— what seems to be the most promising such account they might offer. As I see it, this account will in fact highlight in an intuitively compelling new way what many regard to be the view’s chief liability, namely, that the truths about the future which God is said not to know will now appear even more clearly (and problematically)‘ungrounded’
Keywords Foreknowledge  Free will  Fatalism  Open theism  William Hasker  Peter van Inwagen  Grounding
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11406-013-9505-7
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,208
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Truth and Ontology.Trenton Merricks - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
On Action.Carl Ginet - 1990 - Cambridge University Press.
The Universe as We Find It.John Heil - 2012 - Oxford University Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Counterfactuals of Divine Freedom.Yishai Cohen - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 79 (3):185-205.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Problem for Hasker.Michael Rota - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (3):287-305.
God, Fatalism, and Temporal Ontology.David Kyle Johnson - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (4):435-454.
Belief, Foreknowledge, and Theological Fatalism.Charles T. Hughes - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):378-387.
Foreknowledge and Human Freedom in Augustine.Vance G. Morgan - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:223-242.
Hasker on Omniscience.Bruce Reichenbach - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (1):86-92.
On Freedom and Foreknowledge.Ted A. Warfield - 2000 - Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):255-259.
Is Theism Compatible with Gratuitous Evil?Daniel Howard-Snyder & Frances Howard-Snyder - 1999 - American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (2):115 - 130.
Why Free Will Remains a Mystery.Seth Shabo - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (1):105-125.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
87 ( #77,192 of 2,309,317 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #65,643 of 2,309,317 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature