A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach
E. Michelle Todd, Logan L. Watts, Tyler J. Mulhearn, Brett S. Torrence, Megan R. Turner, Shane Connelly & Michael D. Mumford
Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (6):1719-1754 (2017)
AbstractDespite the growing body of literature on training in the responsible conduct of research, few studies have examined the effectiveness of delivery formats used in ethics courses. The present effort sought to address this gap in the literature through a meta-analytic review of 66 empirical studies, representing 106 ethics courses and 10,069 participants. The frequency and effectiveness of 67 instructional and process-based content areas were also assessed for each delivery format. Process-based contents were best delivered face-to-face, whereas contents delivered online were most effective when restricted to compliance-based instructional contents. Overall, hybrid courses were found to be most effective, suggesting that ethics courses are best delivered using a blend of formats and content areas. Implications and recommendations for future development of ethics education courses in the sciences are discussed.
Similar books and articles
Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education. [REVIEW]Tyler J. Mulhearn, Logan M. Steele, Logan L. Watts, Kelsey E. Medeiros, Michael D. Mumford & Shane Connelly - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (3):883-912.
A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences.Lynn D. Devenport, Shane Connelly, Ryan P. Brown, Michael D. Mumford, Ethan P. Waples, Alison L. Antes & Stephen T. Murphy - 2009 - Ethics and Behavior 19 (5):379-402.
Teaching Business Ethics Online: Perspectives on Course Design, Delivery, Student Engagement, and Assessment. [REVIEW]Denis Collins, James Weber & Rebecca Zambrano - 2014 - Journal of Business Ethics 125 (3):1-17.
Topics and cases for online education in engineering.Jimmy H. Smith - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):451-458.
Face-to-Face Versus Online Tutoring Support in Humanities Courses in Distance Education.John T. E. Richardson - 2009 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 8 (1):69-85.
Cases and goals for ethics education: Commentary on “connecting case-based ethics instruction with educational theory”.Karen Muskavitch - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):431-434.
Using electronic discussion boards to teach responsible conduct of research.David B. Resnik - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (4):617-630.
Reflections on teaching health care ethics on the web.Toby L. Schonfeld - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):481-494.
Business Ethics Training: Face-to-face and at a Distance.Warren French - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):117-126.
Ethics Pedagogy 2.0: A Content Analysis of Award-Winning Media Ethics Exercises.Carol B. Schwalbe & David Cuillier - 2013 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 28 (3):175-188.
Assessing Learner Outcomes in Traditional and Online Medical Ethics Courses.Brian Huschle - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (1):1-18.
Making good use of online case study materials.Matthew Wilks Keefer - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):413-429.
The Role of Professional Knowledge in Case-Based Reasoning in Practical Ethics.Rosa Lynn Pinkus, Claire Gloeckner & Angela Fortunato - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (3):767-787.
What’s in a Name? The Experience of the Other in Online Classrooms.Cathy Adams - 2014 - Phenomenology and Practice 8 (1):51-67.
Improving the student experience: Allowing students enrolled in a required course to select online or face-to-face instruction.S. D. Steiner & M. R. Hyman - 2010 - Marketing Education Review 20 (1):29--34.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
What is Working, What is Not, and What We Need to Know: a Meta-Analytic Review of Business Ethics Instruction.Shane Connelly, Michael Mumford, Logan Steele, Tyler Mulhearn, Logan Watts & Kelsey Medeiros - 2017 - Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (3):245-275.
Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe.Kris Dierickx, Benoit Nemery, Daniel Pizzolato & Shila Abdi - 2021 - Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (1):1-19.
How do researchers acquire and develop notions of research integrity? A qualitative study among biomedical researchers in Switzerland.Priya Satalkar & David Shaw - 2019 - BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):1-12.
What is Working, What is Not, and What We Need to Know: a Meta-Analytic Review of Business Ethics Instruction.Kelsey E. Medeiros, Logan L. Watts, Tyler J. Mulhearn, Logan M. Steele, Michael D. Mumford & Shane Connelly - 2017 - Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (3):245-275.
Research ethics courses as a vaccination against a toxic research environment or culture.Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh & Bor Luen Tang - 2021 - Research Ethics 17 (1):55-65.
References found in this work
A Review of The Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996–2003. [REVIEW]Michael J. O’Fallon & Kenneth D. Butterfield - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4):375 - 413.
A Review of The Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996–2003. [REVIEW]Michael J. O’Fallon & Kenneth D. Butterfield - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 59 (4):375-413.
A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011. [REVIEW]Jana L. Craft - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 117 (2):221-259.
A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Business Ethics Instruction.Ethan P. Waples, Alison L. Antes, Stephen T. Murphy, Shane Connelly & Michael D. Mumford - 2009 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):133-151.
Are Ethics Training Programs Improving? A Meta-Analytic Review of Past and Present Ethics Instruction in the Sciences.Logan L. Watts, Kelsey E. Medeiros, Tyler J. Mulhearn, Logan M. Steele, Shane Connelly & Michael D. Mumford - 2017 - Ethics and Behavior 27 (5):351-384.