A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach

Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (6):1719-1754 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Despite the growing body of literature on training in the responsible conduct of research, few studies have examined the effectiveness of delivery formats used in ethics courses. The present effort sought to address this gap in the literature through a meta-analytic review of 66 empirical studies, representing 106 ethics courses and 10,069 participants. The frequency and effectiveness of 67 instructional and process-based content areas were also assessed for each delivery format. Process-based contents were best delivered face-to-face, whereas contents delivered online were most effective when restricted to compliance-based instructional contents. Overall, hybrid courses were found to be most effective, suggesting that ethics courses are best delivered using a blend of formats and content areas. Implications and recommendations for future development of ethics education courses in the sciences are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,363

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Topics and cases for online education in engineering.Jimmy H. Smith - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):451-458.
Reflections on teaching health care ethics on the web.Toby L. Schonfeld - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):481-494.
Business Ethics Training: Face-to-face and at a Distance.Warren French - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 66 (1):117-126.
Making good use of online case study materials.Matthew Wilks Keefer - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3):413-429.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-02

Downloads
54 (#220,229)

6 months
1 (#451,398)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?