Philosophical Studies 152 (1):127-133 (2010)
There are several argumentative strategies for advancing the thesis that moral responsibility is incompatible with causal determinism. One prominent such strategy is to argue that agents who meet compatibilist conditions for moral responsibility can nevertheless be subject to responsibility-undermining manipulation. In this paper, I argue that incompatibilists advancing manipulation arguments against compatibilism have been shouldering an unnecessarily heavy dialectical burden. Traditional manipulation arguments present cases in which manipulated agents meet all compatibilist conditions for moral responsibility, but are (allegedly) not responsible for their behavior. I argue, however, that incompatibilists can make do with the more modest (and harder to resist) claim that the manipulation in question is mitigating with respect to moral responsibility. The focus solely on whether a manipulated agent is or is not morally responsible has, I believe, masked the full force of manipulation-style arguments against compatibilism. Here, I aim to unveil their real power.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Critique of Pereboom's 'Four-Case Argument' for Incompatibilism.Alfred R. Mele - 2005 - Analysis 65 (285):75-80.
Citations of this work BETA
Defending (a Modified Version of) the Zygote Argument.Patrick Todd - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (1):189-203.
Resisting the Manipulation Argument: A Hard‐Liner Takes It on the Chin.Michael McKenna - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (2):467-484.
A Maneuver Around the Modified Manipulation Argument.Hannah Tierney - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):753-763.
Similar books and articles
Hard- and Soft-Line Responses to Pereboom's Four-Case Manipulation Argument.Ishtiyaque Haji & Stefaan E. Cuypers - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (4):19 - 35.
Plausibility, Manipulation, and Fischer and Ravizza.Christopher Evan Franklin - 2006 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (2):173-192.
Implanted Desires, Self-Formation and Blame.Matthew Talbert - 2009 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (2):1-18.
Moral Responsibility and the Problem of Manipulation Reconsidered.Ishtiyaque Haji & Stefaan E. Cuypers - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (4):439 – 464.
How to Manipulate an Incompatibilistically Free Agent.Roger Clarke - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):139-49.
Manipulation, Compatibilism, and Moral Responsibility.Alfred R. Mele - 2008 - Journal of Ethics 12 (3/4):263-286.
Manipulation and Moral Standing: An Argument for Incompatibilism.Patrick Todd - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12 (7).
Added to index2009-10-26
Total downloads135 ( #34,686 of 2,158,133 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #65,193 of 2,158,133 )
How can I increase my downloads?