Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):727-741 (2000)
How can anyone be rational in a world where knowledge is limited, time is pressing, and deep thought is often an unattainable luxury? Traditional models of unbounded rationality and optimization in cognitive science, economics, and animal behavior have tended to view decision-makers as possessing supernatural powers of reason, limitless knowledge, and endless time. But understanding decisions in the real world requires a more psychologically plausible notion of bounded rationality. In Simple heuristics that make us smart (Gigerenzer et al. 1999), we explore fast and frugal heuristics – simple rules in the mind's adaptive toolbox for making decisions with realistic mental resources. These heuristics can enable both living organisms and artificial systems to make smart choices quickly and with a minimum of information by exploiting the way that information is structured in particular environments. In this précis, we show how simple building blocks that control information search, stop search, and make decisions can be put together to form classes of heuristics, including: ignorance-based and one-reason decision making for choice, elimination models for categorization, and satisficing heuristics for sequential search. These simple heuristics perform comparably to more complex algorithms, particularly when generalizing to new data – that is, simplicity leads to robustness. We present evidence regarding when people use simple heuristics and describe the challenges to be addressed by this research program. Key Words: adaptive toolbox; bounded rationality; decision making; elimination models; environment structure; heuristics; ignorance-based reasoning; limited information search; robustness; satisficing; simplicity.
|Keywords||adaptive toolbox bounded rationality decision making elimination models environment structure heuristics ignorance-based reasoning limited information search robustness satisficing simplicity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Conflict Monitoring in Dual Process Theories of Thinking.Wim De Neys & Tamara Glumicic - 2008 - Cognition 106 (3):1248-1299.
Evolutionary Debunking Arguments and the Reliability of Moral Cognition.Benjamin James Fraser - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (2):457-473.
Intractability and the Use of Heuristics in Psychological Explanations.Iris Rooij, Cory Wright & Todd Wareham - 2012 - Synthese 187 (2):471-487.
Belief Inhibition During Thinking: Not Always Winning but at Least Taking Part.Wim De Neys & Samuel Franssens - 2009 - Cognition 113 (1):45-61.
Similar books and articles
Where Does Fast and Frugal Cognition Stop? The Boundary Between Complex Cognition and Simple Heuristics.Thom Baguley & S. Ian Robertson - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):742-743.
Fast and Frugal Heuristics: What About Unfriendly Environments?James Shanteau & Rickey P. Thomas - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):762-763.
Smart People Who Make Simple Heuristics Work.Annika Wallin & Peter Gärdenfors - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-765.
Heuristics in Technoscientific Thinking.Michael E. Gorman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):752-752.
How Causal Knowledge Simplifies Decision-Making.Rocio Garcia-Retamero & Ulrich Hoffrage - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (3):365-380.
How Smart Can Simple Heuristics Be?Nick Chater - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):745-746.
From Simon 's Scissors for Rationality to Abc's Adaptive Toolbox.X. T. Wang - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-766.
Simple Heuristics Could Make Us Smart; but Which Heuristics Do We Apply When?Richard Cooper - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):746-746.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #83,332 of 2,146,823 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,062 of 2,146,823 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.