Simples and the possibility of discrete space

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):117 – 128 (2006)
What are the necessary and jointly sufficient conditions for an object's being a simple (an object without proper parts)? According to one prominent view, The Pointy View of Simples, an object is a simple if and only if the region occupied by that object contains exactly one point in space. According to another prominent view, MaxCon, an object is a simple if and only if it is maximally continuous. In this paper, I argue that both of these views are inconsistent with the possibility of discrete space. I then go on to formulate analogues to these two views that are consistent with this possibility, and argue that if we are willing to grant the possibility of discrete space, we should endorse the analogue to The Pointy View of Simples over the analogue to MaxCon.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048400600571786
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,803
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Parts of Classes.David Lewis - 1991 - Blackwell.
Simples.Ned Markosian - 1998 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):213 – 228.
Simples, Stuff, and Simple People.Ned Markosian - 2004 - The Monist 87 (3):405-428.
What Are Physical Objects?Ned Markosian - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):375-395.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Simples and Gunk.Hud Hudson - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):291–302.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sider, Hawley, Sider and the Vagueness Argument.Nikk Effingham - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):241 - 250.
Is the Brain Analog or Digital?Chris Eliasmith - 2000 - Cognitive Science Quarterly 1 (2):147-170.
Soc It to Me? Reply to McDaniel on Maxcon Simples.Ned Markosian - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (2):332 – 340.
In Defence of Discrete Space and Time.Jean Paul van Bendegem - 1995 - Logique Et Analyse 38 (150-1):127-150.
A Tale of Two Simples.Joshua Spencer - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 148 (2):167 - 181.
Against Maxcon Simples.Kris McDaniel - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):265 – 275.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
90 ( #59,977 of 2,202,776 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #29,785 of 2,202,776 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature