Abstract

This article explores discursive contrasts used to minimise a groping in Colombian newspaper forums. Analysis with critical discourse analysis and grounded theory shows that constant talk about ‘real’ violence in Colombia limits the groping to being seen primarily in contrast with more commonly discussed examples of crime and violence, including the armed conflict, robbery and murder, and sexual abuse. The contrasts, together with other discursive devices, characterise the perpetrator as a normal, hardworking man; suggest that violence was not present in this act; and portray the woman who was groped as different from victims. The discourse in the forum comments places this groping outside of the category of violence rather than considering it as part of a greater picture of gendered violence in Colombia. The contrasts participate in the muting of women's voices about violence against women in Colombia by silencing the victim's perspective and undermining her pursuit of justice.