Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (2):201-213 (1993)
It is possible to defend the death penalty for aggravated murder in more than one way, and not every defence is equally compelling. The paper takes up arguments put forward by two very distinguished advocates of the death penalty, Mill and Kant. After reviewing Mill's argument and some weaknesses in it, I shall sketch another line of reasoning that combines his conclusion with premisses to be found in Kant. The hybrid argument provides at least the basis for a sound defence of execution for the most serious murders.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Bridge Connecting Pontius Pilate's Sentencing of Jesus to the New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission's Concerns Over Executing the Innocent: When Human Beings with Inherently Human Flaws Determine Guilt or Innocence and Life or Death.James B. Johnston - unknown
Human Dignity and Capital Punishment.Thomas W. Satre - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:233-250.
The Ethics of Medical Involvement in Capital Punishment: A Philosophical Discussion.Joseph B. R. Gaie - 2004 - Kluwer Academic.
Ordinal Proportionality in Punishment: A Case Against Capital Punishment for Child Rape Under the Eighth Amendment.Issa Kohler-Hausmann - manuscript
Book Review:Capital Punishment and the American Agenda. Franklin E. Zimring, Gordon Hawkins; Moral Theory and Capital Punishment. Tom Sorrell. [REVIEW]Stephen Nathanson - 1989 - Ethics 99 (4):964-.
Retributivist Arguments Against Capital Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):188–197.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads27 ( #189,297 of 2,169,769 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,418 of 2,169,769 )
How can I increase my downloads?