Cartesian intuitions, Humean puzzles, and the buddhist conception of the self

Philosophy East and West 60 (4):443-457 (2010)
The utilization of Western canonical thinkers to inform and understand thinkers from India and China is nothing new. More specifically, it is very tempting for a Western-trained philosopher to explain the Buddhist conception of the self by reference to David Hume; both seem to be bundle theories. Moreover, in making such a comparison we seem to get a solution to the puzzle that Hume leaves at the end of A Treatise of Human Nature concerning personal identity. Briefly, Hume holds that we are simply bundles of perceptions. He then admits that he has nothing to hold the perceptions together. The Buddhist conception of the self is as a bundle of five aggregates (skandhas) that are continually changing. In the Buddhist ..
Keywords Hume
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/pew.2010.0008
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
52 ( #109,104 of 2,210,108 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #222,637 of 2,210,108 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature