Utilitas 24 (2):200-213 (2012)

Authors
Patrick Tomlin
University of Warwick
Abstract
Perhaps the best-known theory of fairness is John Broome’s: that fairness is the proportional satisfaction of claims. In this article, I question whether claims are the appropriate focus for a theory of fairness, at least as Broome understands them in his current theory. If fairness is the proportionate satisfaction of claims, I argue, then the following would be true: fairness could not help determine the correct distribution of claims; fairness could not be used to evaluate the distribution of claims; fairness could not guide us in distributing claims (or unowed goods); we could not have a claim to be treated fairly; and we would not be wronged when treated unfairly. These entailments mean that it is questionable that fairness is concerned with claims in the way Broome suggests. At the very least, the relationship between fairness and claims appears to be more complex than the picture painted by Broome.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0953820812000143
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,323
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Fairness.John Broome - 1991 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91:87 - 101.
Fairness.Brad Hooker - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329 - 352.
V—Fairness.John Broome - 1991 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91 (1):87-102.
Kamm on Fairness. [REVIEW]John Broome - 1998 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (4):955.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

How to Be Fairer.Conrad Heilmann & Stefan Wintein - 2017 - Synthese 194 (9):3475-3499.
Priority and Desert.Matthew Rendall - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (5):939-951.
Against Lottocracy.Lachlan Montgomery Umbers - 2018 - European Journal of Political Theory 20 (2):312-334.
Fairness and Aggregation.A. C. Paseau & Ben Saunders - 2015 - Utilitas 27 (4):460-469.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Fairness Between Competing Claims.Ben Saunders - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (1):41-55.
Rawls and the Status of Political Liberty.Steven Wall - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):245–270.
Can a Compromise Be Fair?Peter Jones & Ian O’Flynn - 2013 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12 (2):115-135.
Fairness Versus Welfare.Louis Kaplow - 2002 - Harvard University Press.
Fairness.Brad Hooker - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (4):329 - 352.
Fairness, Political Obligation, and the Justificatory Gap.Jiafeng Zhu - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy (4):1-23.
Fairness in Hierarchical and Entrepreneurial Firms.Michael K. Green - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (11):877-882.
Fairness in the Selection of Employees.Richard D. Arvey & Gary L. Renz - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (5-6):331-340.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-05-23

Total views
88 ( #122,147 of 2,448,721 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #178,140 of 2,448,721 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes