Social Theory and Practice 41 (2):275-285 (2015)

Authors
Patrick Tomlin
University of Warwick
Abstract
Some philosophers believe that we can, in theory, justifiably prepunish people—that is, punish them for a crime before they have committed that crime. In particular, it has been claimed that retributivists ought to accept prepunishment. The question of whether prepunishment can be justified has sparked an interesting and growing philosophical debate. In this paper I look at a slightly different question: whether retributivists who accept that prepunishment can be justified should prefer postpunishment or prepunishment, or see them as on a par. The answer is complex: asking this question brings to light unrecognized distinctions within both retributivism and prepunishment, giving us four different answers to the question, depending on what kind of retributivism and what kind of prepunishment are combined. Surprisingly, given that it is usually presented as a second best, to be pursued only when postpunishment is unavailable, some combinations will find prepunishment preferable.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  Social and Political Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0037-802X
DOI 10.5840/soctheorpract201541215
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,133
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Real-Life Issue of Prepunishment.Preston Greene - forthcoming - Social Theory and Practice.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Time and Retribution.Patrick Tomlin - 2014 - Law and Philosophy 33 (5):655-682.
Compatibilism, Common Sense, and Prepunishment.Matthew Talbert - 2009 - Public Affairs Quarterly 23 (4):325-335.
Compatibilist Objections To Prepunishment.Ryan Lake - 2010 - Florida Philosophical Review 10 (1):7-15.
Retributive Prepunishment.Joseph Q. Adams - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (2):213-222.
Nozick's Revenge.Nigel Walker - 1995 - Philosophy 70 (274):581 - 586.
Team Preferences.Robert Sugden - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):175-204.
Morally, We Should Prefer to Exist: A Response to Smilansky.Sean Johnson - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (4):817-821.
The Utilitarian Justification of Prepunishment.Voin Milevski - 2014 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):25-35.
Fallibility and Retribution.Göran Duus-Otterström - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (3):337-369.
Why We Should Prefer Knowledge.Steven L. Reynolds - 2008 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):79-93.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-09-04

Total views
15 ( #673,582 of 2,448,227 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #451,050 of 2,448,227 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes