Behavior and Philosophy 35:139 - 148 (2007)
Foxall's intentional behaviorism is supposed to provide explanation and understanding where radical behaviorism provides only prediction and control. Foxall does identify empirical and conceptual issues with the operant reinforcement framework, but he underestimates the extent of its flaws and partly misidentifies their nature. His intentional behaviorism suffers from conceptual difficulties, and its adherence to a form of instrumentalism may actually make it harder to understand intentional phenomena.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Intentional Behaviorism and the Intentional Scheme: Comments on Gordon R. Foxall's "Intentional Behaviorism".Hugh Lacey - 2007 - Behavior and Philosophy 35:101 - 111.
Comments on "Intentional Behaviorism" by G. R. Foxall.J. Moore - 2007 - Behavior and Philosophy 35:113 - 130.
Perhaps the Most Difficult Problem Faced by Behaviorism.Thomas Natsoulas - 1983 - Behaviorism 11 (April):1-26.
Behaviorism for New Psychology: What Was Wrong with Behaviorism and What is Wrong with It Now.P. Harzem - 2004 - Behavior and Philosophy 32 (1):5-12.
Conceptions of Determinism in Radical Behaviorism: A Taxonomy.Brent D. Slife, Stephen C. Yanchar & Brant Williams - 1999 - Behavior and Philosophy 27 (2):75 - 96.
Behaviorism and Mentalism: Is There a Third Alternative?Beth Preston - 1994 - Synthese 100 (2):167-96.
A Behavioral Science of Mental Life: Comments on Foxall's "Intentional Behaviorism".Howard Rachlin - 2007 - Behavior and Philosophy 35:131 - 138.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads5 ( #600,818 of 2,171,802 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,802 )
How can I increase my downloads?