Abstract
Chinese public hearings or consultations have been subject to numerous debates, doubts, and scepticism about the existence of Chinese deliberative democracy. More empirical evidence, however, is required about these debates before we can offer any meaningful account of the nature, characteristics, and direction of Chinese deliberation. In addition, although there have been many case studies on grassroots deliberative democracy, such studies are intellectually isolated from each other in the sense that they do not comprise a statistical unit. To overcome this deficiency, we developed a new research method for studying grassroots deliberation by collecting and validating the existing case studies, thereby making them a statistical unit. This paper aims to offer a big-picture perspective and the national statistical trend behind the uneven development of grassroots deliberative democracy. It develops an intellectual framework to assess whether grassroots deliberation is democratic. By collecting, validating, and coding 393 cases of Chinese grassroots deliberations, we have assessed Chinese grassroots deliberation, confirmed the cases’ democratic attributes, and provided a solid statistical result. Although there is strong evidence to support the claim that these grassroots deliberation experiments are democratic, there remain some variations, nuances, and shortcomings. The full picture is not simple, but instead provides a mixed perspective.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1468109918000269
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Concept of Yi (义) in the Mencius and Problems of Distributive Justice.Sor-Hoon Tan - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):489-505.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Authoritarian Deliberation Revisited.Baogang He & Hendrik Wagenaar - 2018 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 19 (4):622-629.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Deliberative Culture and Politics.Baogang He - 2014 - Political Theory 42 (1):58-81.
Feminism and Democratic Deliberation.Georgia Warnke - 2000 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (3):61-74.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-11-17

Total views
8 ( #974,150 of 2,444,756 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,256 of 2,444,756 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes