Metaphilosophy 39 (2):220–250 (2008)

Authors
Christopher H. Toner
University of St. Thomas, Minnesota
Abstract
In this article I investigate several "sorts of naturalism" that have been advanced in recent years as possible foundations for virtue ethics: those of Michael Thompson, Philippa Foot, Rosalind Hursthouse, John McDowell, and Larry Arnhart. Each of these impressive attempts fails in illuminatingly different ways, and in the opening sections I analyze what has gone variously wrong. I next use this analysis to articulate four criteria that any successful Aristotelian naturalism must meet (my goal is to show what naturalism must deliver, not yet to show that it can deliver it). I then look at Alasdair MacIntyre's approach, which begins with our natural trajectory from complete dependency toward becoming independent practical reasoners; I argue that this sort of naturalism meets the aforementioned criteria and thus provides a good example of what Aristotelian naturalists must do. I close with a consideration of two important objections to any broadly MacIntyrean sort of naturalism.
Keywords virtue ethics  Hursthouse  McDowell  naturalism  MacIntyre  Foot
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2008.00538.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,908
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mind and World.John McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
On Virtue Ethics.Rosalind Hursthouse - 1999 - Oxford University Press.
Natural Goodness.Philippa Foot - 2001 - Oxford University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Neo-Aristotelian Naturalism and the Indeterminacy Objection.Scott Woodcock - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (1):20-41.
Aristotelian Naturalism Vs. Mutants, Aliens and the Great Red Dragon.Scott Woodcock - 2018 - American Philosophical Quarterly 55 (4):313-328.
Human Nature and Moral Sprouts: Mencius on the Pollyanna Problem.Richard T. Kim - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (1):140-162.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Naturalism in Mathematics and the Authority of Philosophy.Alexander Paseau - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):377-396.
Three Sorts of Naturalism.Hans Fink - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):202–221.
Why Naturalism?David Copp - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):179-200.
Two Kinds of Naturalism in Ethics.Neil Sinclair - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (4):417 - 439.
Naturalism and the Problem of Intentionality.Michael Tye - 1994 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):122-42.
Naturalisms in Philosophy of Mind.Steven Horst - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):219-254.
Philosophical Naturalism at the Turn of the Century.Robert Audi - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:27-45.
How Successful is Naturalism?Georg Gasser (ed.) - 2007 - Ontos Verlag.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
95 ( #121,213 of 2,497,711 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,634 of 2,497,711 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes