The case against robotic warfare: A response to Arkin

Journal of Military Ethics 11 (2):149-168 (2012)
Abstract Semi-autonomous robotic weapons are already carving out a role for themselves in modern warfare. Recently, Ronald Arkin has argued that autonomous lethal robotic systems could be more ethical than humans on the battlefield, and that this marks a significant reason in favour of their development and use. Here I offer a critical response to the position advanced by Arkin. Although I am sympathetic to the spirit of the motivation behind Arkin's project and agree that if we decide to develop and use these machines they ought to be programmed to behave ethically, there are several major problems with his view as it stands. At present, it is not clear whether such machines would be capable of behaving more ethically than humans. More importantly, to the extent that humans would remain in the context of war, human moral transgressions will continue, especially in the face of complicated ethical challenges accompanying automated warfare. Moreover, even if machines could be more ethical than humans in certain ways and in certain situations, this says nothing about whether warfare that contains these machines would itself be overall more ethical than warfare that does not include them as participants, or whether the inclusion of lethal robots is the best way to guard against human moral transgressions in war.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15027570.2012.708265
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,440
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Killer Robots.Robert Sparrow - 2007 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (1):62–77.
How Just Could a Robot War Be?Peter Asaro - 2008 - In P. Brey, A. Briggle & K. Waelbers (eds.), Current Issues in Computing and Philosophy. Ios Press. pp. 50--64.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Evolution of Human Warfare.G. R. Pitman - 2011 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (3):352-379.
Waging War: A Philosophical Introduction.Ian Clark - 1988 - Oxford University Press.
Information Warfare: A Response to Taddeo.Tim Stevens - 2013 - Philosophy and Technology 26 (2):221-225.
Can Information Warfare Ever Be Just?John Arquilla - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (3):203-212.
Out of Character: On the Creation of Virtuous Machines. [REVIEW]Ryan Tonkens - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (2):137-149.
Biowarfare as a Biopolitical Icon.Emilio Mordini - 2005 - Poiesis and Praxis 3 (4):242-255.
Ethics and Nuclear Deterrence.Geoffrey L. Goodwin (ed.) - 1982 - St. Martin's Press.
When Does Morality Win?Saul Smilansky - 2010 - Ratio 23 (1):102-110.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
18 ( #275,113 of 2,180,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #303,871 of 2,180,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums