Linguistic convention and worldly fact: Prospects for a naturalist theory of the a priori

Philosophical Studies 176 (7):1725-1752 (2019)

Abstract

Truth by convention, once thought to be the foundation of a uniquely promising approach to explaining our access to the truth in nonempirical domains, is nowadays widely considered an absurdity. Its fall from grace has been due largely to the influence of an argument that can be sketched as follows: our linguistic conventions have the power to make it the case that a sentence expresses a particular proposition, but they can’t by themselves generate truth; whether a given proposition is true—and so whether the sentence that expresses it is true—is a matter of what the world is like, which means it isn’t a matter of convention alone. The consensus is that this argument is decisive against truth by convention. Strikingly, though, it has rarely been formulated with much precision. Here I provide a new rendering of the argument, one that reveals its structure and makes transparent just what assumptions it requires, and then I assess conventionalists’ prospects for resisting each of those assumptions. I conclude that the consensus is mistaken: contrary to what is almost universally thought, there remains a promising way forward for the conventionalist project. Along the way, I clarify conventionalists’ commitments by thinking about what truth by convention would need to be like in order for conventionalism to do the epistemological work it’s intended to do.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-31

Downloads
277 (#40,371)

6 months
51 (#15,777)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Writing the Book of the World.Theodore Sider - 2011 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction.Gideon Rosen - 2010 - In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffmann (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. pp. 109-135.
Guide to Ground.Kit Fine - 2012 - In Fabrice Correia & Benjamin Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge University Press. pp. 37--80.
Language, Truth and Logic.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1936 - London: V. Gollancz.

View all 103 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

Analyticity.Tom Donaldson - 2020 - In Michael J. Raven (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphysical Grounding. New York, USA: pp. 288-299.
Linguistic Conventionalism and the Truth-Contrast Thesis.Fredrik Nyseth - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 71 (2):264-285.
Truth in Virtue of Meaning Reconsidered.Kai Michael Büttner - 2021 - Philosophical Papers 50 (1-2):109-139.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Possibility of Truth by Convention.Jared Warren - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (258):84-93.
Carnap and Quine on Truth by Convention.Gary Ebbs - 2011 - Mind 120 (478):193-237.
Agreements, Conventions, and Language.Margaret Gilbert - 1983 - Synthese 54 (3):375 - 407.
The Argument From Convention Revisited.Francesco Pupa - 2018 - Synthese 195 (5):2175-2204.
Tarski’s Convention T: Condition Beta.John Corcoran - forthcoming - South American Journal of Logic 1 (1).
What is a Convention?Dana Riesenfeld - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (2):442-455.
What is a Convention?Dana Riesenfeld - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (2):441-454.
Convention: Poincaré and Some of His Critics.Yemima Ben‐Menahem - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):471-513.
Conventionalism.Iris Einheuser - 2003 - Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Revisiting Quine on Truth by Convention.Jared Warren - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (2):119-139.
Meaning.Kent Bach - 2003 - In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group.
Theories of Truth and Convention T.Douglas Patterson - 2002 - Philosophers' Imprint 2:1-16.
Truth-Makers and Convention T.Jan Woleński - 2011 - Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan.