In Carnap’s Defense: A survey on the concept of a linguistic framework in Carnap’s philosophy

Abstracta 9 (1):03-30 (2016)

Authors
Parzhad Torfehnezhad
Université de Montréal
Abstract
The main task in this paper is to detail and investigate Carnap’s conception of a “linguistic framework”. On this basis, we will see whether Carnap’s dichotomies, such as the analytic-synthetic distinction, are to be construed as absolute/fundamental dichotomies or merely as relative dichotomies. I argue for a novel interpretation of Carnap’s conception of a LF and, on that basis, will show that, according to Carnap, all the dichotomies to be discussed are relative dichotomies; they depend on conventional decisions concerning the logical syntax of LF. Thus, all of the dichotomies directly hinge on the conception of the LF. The LF’s logical structure, in turn, is an immediate consequence of adopting the linguistic doctrine of logical truths. As we will see, no appeal to any of these distinctions is necessary in establishing a LF and all of its components. I will also draw attention to the differences between what Carnap labels a “way of speaking”, “language”, and “artificial language”. Consequently, I will briefly conclude that none of Quine’s major objections address the main points of Carnap’s theory.
Keywords analytic-synthetic distinction  levels of abstraction  logical syntax  Carnap  Quine  linguistic framework
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
The Web of Belief.W. V. O. Quine & J. S. Ullian - 1970 - New York: Random House.

View all 69 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Logical and the Analytic.Richard Creath - 2017 - Synthese 194 (1):79-96.
Empirical Equivalence in the Quine-Carnap Debate.Eric J. Loomis - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
On Quine on Carnap on Ontology.Marc Alspector-Kelly - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 102 (1):93 - 122.
Putting the Bite Back Into 'Two Dogmas'.Paul Gregory - 2003 - Principia 7 (1-2):115-129.
Carnap and Incommensurability.Stathis Psillos - 2008 - Philosophical Inquiry 30 (1-2):135-156.
Carnap's Criterion of Logicality.Denis Bonnay - 2009 - In Pierre Wagner (ed.), Carnap's Logical Syntax of Language. Palgrave-Macmillan.
‘‘Quine’s Evolution From ‘Carnap’s Disciple’ to the Author of “Two Dogmas.Greg Frost-Arnold - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):291-316.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-09

Total views
305 ( #19,683 of 2,271,927 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #26,627 of 2,271,927 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature