Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (3):197-215 (2011)
The scientific consensus regarding anthropogenic climate change is firmly established yet climate change denialism, a species of what I call pseudoskepticism, is on the rise in industrial nations most responsible for climate change. Such denialism suggests the need for a robust ethics of inquiry and public discourse. In this paper I argue: (1) that ethical obligations of inquiry extend to every voting citizen insofar as citizens are bound together as a political body. (2) It is morally condemnable for public officials to put forward assertions contrary to scientific consensus when such consensus is decisive for public policy and legislation. (3) It is imperative upon educators, journalists, politicians and all those with greater access to the public forum to condemn, factually and ethically, pseudoskeptical assertions made in the public realm without equivocation.
|Keywords||John Rawls W.K. Clifford Public Reason Climate Change Inquiry Belief Ethics Science Global Warming|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Ethics of Belief, Cognition, and Climate Change Pseudoskepticism: Implications for Public Discourse.Lawrence Torcello - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1):19-48.
Scientific Facts and Methods in Public Reason.Karin Jønch-Clausen & Klemens Kappel - 2016 - Res Publica 22 (2):117-133.
Similar books and articles
Scientific Discovery Based on Belief Revision.Eric Martin & Daniel Osherson - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1352-1370.
Science, Technology and Democracy: Perspectives About the Complex Relation Between the Scientific Community, the Scientific Journalist and Public Opinion.Antonio López Peláez & José Antonio Díaz - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (1):55 – 68.
Arendt, Habermas and Facebook: Participation and Discourse in Cyber Public Spheres.Asaf Bar-Tura - 2010 - Humanities and Technology Review 29:1-25.
Public Discourse: Creating the Conditions for Dialogue Concerning the Common Good in a Postmodern Heterogeneous Democracy.Peggy Ruth Geren - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (3):191-199.
Bioethics and Public Reason: A Report on Ethics and Public Discourse in Spain.Adela Cortina - 2009 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (3):241.
Right to Know, Press Freedom, Public Discourse.Cummins Gauthier Candace - 1999 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 14 (4):197-212.
Religion and Bioethics: Can We Talk? [REVIEW]William Stempsey - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):339-350.
Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony.Elizabeth Anderson - 2011 - Episteme 8 (2):144-164.
Science and the Consequences of Mistruct: Lessons From Recent GM Controversies. [REVIEW]Dane Scott - 2003 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (6):569-582.
Is Science Socially Constructed—and Can It Still Inform Public Policy?Sheila Jasanoff - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3):263-276.
Added to index2011-04-21
Total downloads505 ( #3,221 of 2,158,357 )
Recent downloads (6 months)47 ( #5,982 of 2,158,357 )
How can I increase my downloads?