The Need for Randomised Controlled Trials in Educational Research

British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (3):316 - 328 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues for more randomised controlled trials in educational research. Educational researchers have largely abandoned the methodology they helped to pioneer. This gold-standard methodology should be more widely used as it is an appropriate and robust research technique. Without subjecting curriculum innovations to a RCT then potentially harmful educational initiatives could be visited upon the nation's children.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Proteus rising: Re-imagining educational research.Richard Smith - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (s1):183-198.
Publication Bias: The Achilles' Heel of Systematic Reviews?Carole J. Torgerson - 2006 - British Journal of Educational Studies 54 (1):89 - 102.
What are randomised controlled trials good for?Nancy Cartwright - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 147 (1):59 - 70.
What makes placebo-controlled trials unethical?Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):3 – 9.
The Research Misconception.Maurie Markman - 2004 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):241-252.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
36 (#431,270)

6 months
13 (#185,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What is Multi–level Modelling For?Stephen Gorard - 2003 - British Journal of Educational Studies 51 (1):46-63.
The place of systematic reviews in education research.Richard Andrews - 2005 - British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4):399-416.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references