The Trouble with Pseudoskepticism

Skeptical Inquirer 36 (3) (2012)

Authors
Lawrence Torcello
Rochester Institute of Technology
Abstract
The continuing rejection of anthropogenic global warming by non-experts despite overwhelming scientific consensus is rationally untenable and best described as “pseudoskeptical;” it is akin to AIDS denialism, the advocacy of intelligent design, and anti-vaccination movements.
Keywords Pseudoskepticism  Climate Denialism  Anthropogenic Global Warming
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

History, Politics, and Claims of Man-Made Global Warming.John David Lewis - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2):231-271.
Global Warming, Equity and Future Generations.Robin Attfield - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:5-11.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-05-04

Total views
217 ( #28,169 of 2,236,040 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #58,441 of 2,236,040 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature