Anachronism and retrospective explanation: In defence of a present-centred history of science

Abstract
This paper defends the right of historians to make use of their knowledge of the remote consequences of past actions. In particular, it is argued that the disciplinary cohesion of the history of science relies crucially upon our ability to target, for further investigation, those past activities ancestral to modern science. The history of science is not limited to the study of those activities but it is structured around them. In this sense, the discipline is inherently 'present-centred': its boundaries are determined, in part, by judgements inaccessible to the historical actors. Present-centredness of this sort, it is urged, should not be regarded as a problem; its methodological consequences are minimal.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/S0039-3681(03)00052-9
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,122
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Getting the Game Right: Some Plain Words on the Identity and Invention of Science.Andrew Cunningham - 1988 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 19 (3):365-389.
Possession, Exorcism and Psychoanalysis.N. Tosh - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):583-596.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Hermeneutical Contributions to the History of Science: Gadamer on 'Presentism'.Oscar Moro Abadía - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (2):372-380.
Science, Truth and History, Part I. Historiography, Relativism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.N. Tosh - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):675-701.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Herbert Butterfield (1900-79) as a Christian Historian of Science.R. Cabral - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (4):547-564.
Philosophy of Science and History of Science: A Troubling Interaction. [REVIEW]Cassandra Pinnick & George Gale - 2000 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31 (1):109-125.
A Useful Anachronism: John Locke, the Corpuscular Philosophy, and Inference to the Best Explanation.Selman Halabi - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (2):241-259.
Theory in History.Leon J. Goldstein - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (1):23-40.
Varieties and Vagaries of Historical Explanation.Paul A. Roth - 2008 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (2):214-226.
Possession, Exorcism and Psychoanalysis.N. Tosh - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):583-596.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
21 ( #242,739 of 2,191,293 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #291,146 of 2,191,293 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature