Science, truth and history, part II. metaphysical Bolt-holds for the sociology of scientific knowlege?

Historians of science have frequently sought to exclude modern scientific knowledge from their narratives. Part I of this paper, published in the previous issue, cautioned against seeing more than a literary preference at work here. In particular, it was argued—contra advocates of the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge —that a commitment to epistemological relativism should not be seen as having straightforward historiographical consequences. Part II considers further SSK-inspired attempts to entangle the currently fashionable historiography with particular positions in the philosophy of science. None, I argue, is promising. David Bloor’s proposed alliance with scientific realism relies upon a mistaken view of contrastive explanation; Andrew Pickering’s appeal to instrumentalism is persuasive for particle physics but much less so for science as a whole; and Bruno Latour’s home-grown metaphysics is so bizarre that its compatibility with SSK is, if anything, a further blow to the latter’s plausibility.
Keywords Historiography  Sociology of scientific knowledge  Contrastive explanation  Realism  Instrumentalism  Bruno Latour
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.002
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,780
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Anti-Latour.D. Bloor - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):81-112.
Realism and the Strong Program.Tim Lewens - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):559-577.
Postmodern? No, Simply Amodern! Steps Towards an Anthropology of Science.Bruno Latour - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (1):145-171.
Possession, Exorcism and Psychoanalysis.N. Tosh - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (4):583-596.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
I Am Knowledge. Get Me Out of Here! On Localism and the Universality of Science.Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):590-601.
Historicism and the Failure of HPS.Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:3-11.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Reviving the Sociology of Science.Philip Kitcher - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):44.
Truth and Scientific Progress.Jarrett Leplin - 1981 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 12 (4):269-291.
Why Did Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions Cause a Fuss?B. Larvor - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):369-390.
Articulating the Aims of Science.Nicholas Maxwell - 1977 - Nature 265 (January 6):2.
Sociology as a Science.David V. McQueen - 1981 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 12 (2):263-284.
Science, Truth and History, Part I. Historiography, Relativism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.N. Tosh - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):675-701.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
6 ( #613,768 of 2,214,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #239,034 of 2,214,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature