Science, truth and history, part II. metaphysical Bolt-holds for the sociology of scientific knowlege?

Abstract
Historians of science have frequently sought to exclude modern scientific knowledge from their narratives. Part I of this paper, published in the previous issue, cautioned against seeing more than a literary preference at work here. In particular, it was argued—contra advocates of the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge —that a commitment to epistemological relativism should not be seen as having straightforward historiographical consequences. Part II considers further SSK-inspired attempts to entangle the currently fashionable historiography with particular positions in the philosophy of science. None, I argue, is promising. David Bloor’s proposed alliance with scientific realism relies upon a mistaken view of contrastive explanation; Andrew Pickering’s appeal to instrumentalism is persuasive for particle physics but much less so for science as a whole; and Bruno Latour’s home-grown metaphysics is so bizarre that its compatibility with SSK is, if anything, a further blow to the latter’s plausibility.
Keywords Historiography  Sociology of scientific knowledge  Contrastive explanation  Realism  Instrumentalism  Bruno Latour
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2006.12.002
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,581
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Anti-Latour.D. Bloor - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):81-112.
Anti-Latour.David Bloor - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (1):81-112.
Realism and the Strong Program.Tim Lewens - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):559-577.
Postmodern? No, Simply Amodern! Steps Towards an Anthropology of Science.Bruno Latour - 1990 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 21 (1):145-171.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

I Am Knowledge. Get Me Out of Here! On Localism and the Universality of Science.Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):590-601.
Historicism and the Failure of HPS.Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55:3-11.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reviving the Sociology of Science.Philip Kitcher - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):44.
Truth and Scientific Progress.Jarrett Leplin - 1981 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 12 (4):269-291.
Why Did Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions Cause a Fuss?B. Larvor - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):369-390.
Articulating the Aims of Science.Nicholas Maxwell - 1977 - Nature 265 (January 6):2.
Sociology as a Science.David V. McQueen - 1981 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 12 (2):263-284.
Science, Truth and History, Part I. Historiography, Relativism and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.N. Tosh - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4):675-701.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-08-21

Total downloads
8 ( #573,464 of 2,268,443 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #212,043 of 2,268,443 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature