Criticism in the history of science: Newton on absolute space, time, and motion, II

Philosophical Review 68 (2):203-227 (1959)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2182167
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,046
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Henri Poincaré's Philosophy of Science.David Stump - 1989 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 20 (3):335-363.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Leibniz on Force and Absolute Motion.John T. Roberts - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (3):553-573.
Why the Parts of Absolute Space Are Immobile.Nick Huggett - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (3):391-407.
Space and Relativity in Newton and Leibniz.Richard Arthur - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):219-240.
Concepts of Space.Max Jammer - 1969 - Cambridge: Mass., Harvard University Press.
Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion.Robert Rynasiewicz - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Newton's Conceptual Argument for Absolute Space.Ori Belkind - 2007 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):271 – 293.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

195 ( #20,102 of 2,126,921 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #393,631 of 2,126,921 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums