Emotion Review 2 (2):163-177 (2010)

Although pride has been central to philosophical and religious discussions of emotion for thousands of years, it has largely been neglected by psychologists. However, in the past decade a growing body of psychological research on pride has emerged; new theory and findings suggest that pride is a psychologically important and evolutionarily adaptive emotion. In this article we review this accumulated body of research and argue for a naturalist account of pride, which presumes that pride emerged by way of natural selection. In this view, pride is prevalent in human life because of the functional and adaptive role it has played in the attainment, maintenance, and communication of social status throughout our evolutionary history
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1754073909354627
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,972
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

An Argument for Basic Emotions.Paul Ekman - 1992 - Cognition and Emotion 6 (3-4):169-200.
The Blank Slate. The Modern Denial of Human Nature.Steven Pinker - 2004 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 66 (4):765-767.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
80 ( #124,601 of 2,410,089 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #67,610 of 2,410,089 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes