Erkenntnis 28 (2):253 - 267 (1988)
At first sight one might be tempted to regard Descartes' »cogito ergo sum« as logically true by existential generalisation. This however would neither exhaust the specific epistemic content of »cogito« nor reveal the philosophical peculiarities of »sum« which the author takes to have two ontologically different meanings. The full sense of »cogito ergo sum« finally turns out to be Credo* me* cogitare ergo scio* me* esse1/2. Furthermore this proposition can formally be proved to be true by means of epistemic logic.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Cogito, Ergo Sum: The Life of Rene Descartes (Review).Dennis des Chene - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (1):113-115.
Cogito Ergo Sum: The Life of Rene Descartes (Review).Patrick Gerard Henry - 2002 - Philosophy and Literature 26 (2):465-468.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #163,813 of 2,158,407 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #354,697 of 2,158,407 )
How can I increase my downloads?